‘No first use’ nuke policy an empty gesture | The Enterprise
The Enterprise
Login
SearchHelpSubscriptions

OPINION

‘No first use’ nuke policy an empty gesture

Posted on October 9, 2021

OpinionColumns

Thomas L. Knapp

Thomas L. Knapp

“Debate on ‘no first use’ of nukes mushrooms in Washington,” Joe Gould reports at Defense News.

“Five years after President Barack Obama turned back from declaring a ‘no first use’ as U.S. policy for nuclear weapons,” Gould writes, “opponents say the Biden administration is considering it too, and warn that it risks alienating allies.”

Is it really a big deal for the U.S. government to affirm that it will not use nuclear weapons first in any future conflict?

Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, says it would signal to prospective enemies  “that they can plan an attack and do whatever they want to and not worry.”

That argument might pass the smell test if anyone believed a word the U.S. government said for public consumption, but the Washington foreign policy establishment enjoys no such credibility. The U.S. does what it wants, when it wants, past commitments be damned, and no foreign power’s diplomats or generals, allied or hostile, are naive enough to expect otherwise.

A “no first use” proclamation, whether passed by Congress or simply announced by a president, would be the equivalent of an abusive husband buying flowers for his wife.

The flowers don’t mean he’s not going to throw her down the stairs the next time he comes home drunk, just like he did the last time and the time before that. Nor is she likely to take them that way. They’re just a nice, pretty, empty gesture.

Of course, the U.S. government isn’t an abusive husband. It’s the world’s most powerful organized crime syndicate, and its nuclear arsenal is a key element in enforcing its global protection racket.

Like all such rackets, this one starts with a pseudo-friendly “nice country ya got there ... be a shame if anything happened to it.”

And, as with all such rackets, the implication is that if the victim doesn’t fork over whatever’s demanded, he can expect to get pistol-whipped or perhaps thrown through a plate glass window for starters, and eventually have his establishment burned down if he doesn’t play ball.

The maintenance of a nuclear arsenal of any significant size — that is, larger than a handful of “deterrent” weapons — covers all those bases. A supposed “no first use” policy wouldn’t diminish the actual or perceived threat in any way. It would just be a nice, unconvincing gesture.

No big deal either way, so why pretend it’s a matter of weighty policy debate?

Thomas L. Knapp (Twitter: @thomaslknapp) is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.

More Opinion

Albert Thomas Jr.

WEATHERCAST

Much-needed rain may arrive Monday

By Al Thomas
| October 23, 2021

Sunshine and mild temperatures are likely this weekend, but by late Monday, there is a good chance o...

Thomas L. Knapp

OPINION

Political power is problem, not solution

By Thomas L. Knapp
| October 23, 2021

President Joe Biden wants the Occupational Safety & Health Administration to mandate COVID-19 vaccin...

Mike Walden

YOU DECIDE

Is a wealth tax in the future?

By Mike Walden
| October 23, 2021

Trillions of dollars were added to the national debt during the COVID-19 pandemic as the federal gov...


Local News

Powered by Nash & Pine | v4.1.4