SGWASA has had questionable success | The Butner-Creedmoor News
SearchHelpSubscribe / renew
LoginCreate account

Letter to the Editor

SGWASA has had questionable success

Posted on March 31, 2021

Updated on April 1, 2021

OpinionLetters
The Butner-Creedmoor News welcomes letters to the editor of 350 words or fewer. Letters should be signed with the writer's name and hometown. Include a phone number for verification purposes. Phone numbers are not published. Email your letter to the editor to editor@butnercreedmoornews.com.

Stock image | Metro Newspaper Service

The Butner-Creedmoor News welcomes letters to the editor of 350 words or fewer. Letters should be signed with the writer's name and hometown. Include a phone number for verification purposes. Phone numbers are not published. Email your letter to the editor to editor@butnercreedmoornews.com.

I have been a staunch critic of the South Granville Water and Sewer Authority board — those seven individuals who hold part of our health and wallet in their hands with the decisions they make. I’ve long wondered why they appear so defensive regarding the organization and it’s shortfalls, rather than simply admit they have problems, ranging from cash shortages for repairs to product quality issues, something customers know already.

Comments from a board member at their last meeting might have revealed the answer. Stem Board member Kenneth McLamb said: “We are experiencing very few water quality issues.”

So what’s wrong with that statement? It was stated seemingly as defense for SGWASA referencing the independent tests Stem has taken on its water quality, which he stated “are in line with SGWASA.” Sounds like he is saying having only a “few water quality issues” is not that bad. Not to mention being “in line with SGWASA” isn’t exactly a reassuring benchmark for many.

I hope not, because anyone who rents, or invests $200,000-plus for a home in Stem or this area, ought to be provided clean, non-smelly non-discolored water, every day, period — especially with the high rates we are charged.

Perhaps some board members need to refresh themselves with the parable found in Matthew and Luke regarding the shepherd who leaves his flock of 99 to find just one. Every single person and customer is important, and the idea that only a few are experiencing issues should not be a measure of success.

It’s unconscionable to continue enticing others to move into the area, knowing they will soon be subject to questionable quality water, accompanied by a bill often higher than their electric bill, but for some SGWASA board members, it doesn’t appear to disturb them. When you consider some of their past comments (Jimmy Gooch’s recent “If you don’t like it, then maybe you should consider moving” or Tim Karan’s ‘’Sure our water may be smelly, and leave a ring here and there, but at least it’s safe to drink,” or his “Sometimes that’s the way the cookie crumbles”) you can understand why I question SGWASA’s measure of success.

John Mayo
BUTNER

Related content

Never a better time to invest in NC

North Carolina is poised to make great gains as we recover from the pandemic. We are becoming a majo...

'Partisan' reading bill passes easily

RALEIGH — On March 31, the North Carolina Senate passed the hugely controversial SB 387, titled the ...

Chasin’ squirrels leads to laughs

CREEDMOOR — Several years ago, while covering a local municipality meeting, the board wandered way o...


local news

Granville planning joint celebration for GAP, 275th anniversary

OXFORD — County officials say they plan to celebrate completing the third phase of Granville Athleti...

Overnight resurfacing work scheduled next week for NC 56 and US 15

CREEDMOOR — A contractor working for the state will repave several highways around Creedmoor next we...

New tax administrator sworn in

Trending recipes